In Singapore, buyers shortlist condos and good-class bungalows from their phones before they ever ring an agent — so a property site that loads slowly or reads as a blur to Google quietly loses the enquiry. Most agency sites leak it to photo-stuffed listings that tank on mobile, duplicate IDX URLs with no canonical, and sold units left rotting in the index. Start with a free instant scan: your score out of 100 and your top issues, in seconds, no signup.
Singapore is Asia's wealthiest property hub: high digital maturity, PDPA-aware buyers, genuine budgets, and a market that expects polish and a clear return. Buyers and tenants here live on PropertyGuru, 99.co and EdgeProp on their phones, then circle back to an agency or developer site to verify a unit, a floor plan, a district, a price. That last hop is exactly where most sites quietly lose them.
Here's the trap. An agency invests in a gorgeous, image-rich site — a hero gallery for every listing, lifestyle shots of the development, a sweeping map. To the eye it looks premium. But on a buyer's phone on the MRT, those un-optimised galleries take seconds to settle, the layout jumps as photos load, and Google reads a slow, unstable page and ranks it lower. Meanwhile the IDX/MLS feed has quietly spawned a dozen near-identical URLs for the same condo, none of them marked as canonical. The free instant scan reads your live site the way Google and AI engines do and hands back a plain-English picture in seconds — before you spend a dollar.
These aren't cosmetic. Each one is a high-intent buyer or tenant who lands on a competitor's listing instead — and every one of them is fixable.
No signup, nothing upfront. Drop in your agency or listing site's URL and the scan reads your live pages and returns, in seconds:
One honest number for how well your site reads to buyers, search and AI right now — the same lens used on every site I rebuild.
The handful of headline problems dragging you down — a slow gallery, a duplicate-URL trap, a missing schema signal — named in plain English, not a wall of jargon.
Enough to know whether real enquiries are leaking — and to decide if you want the full picture for your inventory.
It's a fast, instant read — not the full 149-check audit. Think of it as the gut-check before you commit a dollar. Run the free scan →
Beyond the scan, there's a small toolkit you can use right now with no email — handy for a Singapore agency doing its own first pass. Check how fast and stable a heavy listing page actually feels on mobile, whether AI assistants can read your inventory, and where the obvious gaps are before you involve anyone.
The free scan tells you something's leaking. The deep audit tells you exactly what, where, and in what order to fix it. It's a human-reviewed report — not an automated dump — built for the way Singapore property buyers actually evaluate a unit: listing and Place schema per unit, image and Core Web Vitals performance on the galleries that drag, IDX canonical and duplicate-URL control, indexing and stale-listing cleanup, local SEO and NAP consistency, AI-readability, and an internal-link map showing which active listings are starved of authority.
No signup to start. You only pay once you've seen your free score.
A property site drifts constantly: new listings go up daily, sold units need retiring, an IDX feed update reshuffles URLs, a plugin breaks a gallery. If you want, there's an optional monitoring membership that re-scans monthly and watches uptime — so a duplicate-URL leak or a dead listing gets caught before it costs you enquiries. No pressure; it's there when you're ready, and most agencies ask about it once their report lands.
Yes. The instant scan gives you a score out of 100 and your top issues in seconds, with no signup and nothing upfront. The 149-check deep audit is the only paid part, at USD $297, and only if you decide you want the full picture.
Singapore buyers shop property from their phones, often on mobile data. Galleries stuffed with full-resolution, un-sized images blow out your Core Web Vitals — the page loads slowly and jumps around as it renders. Google quietly deprioritises that listing, and an impatient high-intent buyer bounces to PropertyGuru or a competitor before your photos even finish loading.
Almost always. IDX and MLS feeds spawn the same listing at several addresses — filter and sort parameters, paginated variants, agent-tagged copies. Without canonical tags telling Google which URL is the real one, your ranking strength splits across the duplicates so none win, and crawl budget gets wasted on near-identical pages instead of your money listings.
Yes. I'm based in the Philippines and serve Singapore agencies remotely. SGT is the same time zone as the Philippines, so reviews, calls and turnaround happen in real time during your business day — no overnight lag while a hot listing sits broken. The audit reads your live site exactly as Google and AI do, which is location-independent.
On most sites, far too many of them stay indexed long after the unit is gone. Stale sold and rented listings clutter your search results, pull authority away from live inventory, and send a buyer to a dead-end page — a wasted click and a lost enquiry. The audit flags stale indexed listings and the redirect or status handling they need.
Yes. Without RealEstateListing, Residence and Place structured data, Google and AI engines can't reliably read the price, tenure, district, bedroom count or location of a unit — so you're absent from rich results and from the AI answer a buyer reads while shortlisting. In Singapore's mature, high-digital market, that machine-readability is exactly where enquiries are won or quietly lost.
The free scan is an instant score plus your headline issues. The $297 deep audit is 149 checks across 15 categories — listing and Place schema, image and Core Web Vitals performance, IDX duplicate-URL and canonical control, indexing and stale-listing cleanup, local SEO and NAP, AI-readability and more — human-reviewed and delivered as a prioritised fix list within 3 business days.